in discussion Per Page Discussions / Per page discussions » Additional Context VS Descripttion
I think we could change what is the standard of what is to be written in Additional Context. The word "description" in itself doesn't feel right when including information revealed from experiments or addendums, which may not necessarily be that relevant to the SCP in question.
Basically, I think the description should be limited to the abilities of the SCP and what it itself does anomalously and perhaps what is "obviously" stated up front. Additional Context would be the "twist" or anything that is meant to be inferred from the addendums or any other things attached.
This is also because its really difficult to find anything that fits the current criteria for "Additional Context". Perhaps we could create a new "Additional History" or something like that?
