in discussion Per Page Discussions / Per page discussions » SCP-2602, which used to be a library
i cant belive this scp used to be a library!
original character plz no steel
Recent Forum Posts
in discussion Per Page Discussions / Per page discussions » SCP-2602, which used to be a library
I'm requesting an edit lock of the main page.
About five minutes ago, a user blanked the entire page and replaced it with a pornographic image I need not go into. I reverted it to the previous revision, but you should restrict editing of the main page due to its vulnerability and importance as the main page of the site, possibly to moderators.
Thanks,
Inferno,
A Guy Nobody Knows who Joined the Site Two Minutes Ago
(account deleted) 15 Jul 2021 01:53
in discussion Per Page Discussions / Per page discussions » Who are the mods here?
Emmm are there moderators here?
Hi there! I’m the author of SCP-1025 and a few other articles on the main site. I had an attack of nostalgia/need for ego boosting today and decided to Google this one since it seems to be my most popular. I came across this site and I love it.
One thing: SCP-1025 doesn’t inflict diseases or even symptoms on anybody who reads it. In inflicts the targeted paranoia of other people on the person who reads it.
That is to say, if I read any entry in the book, people around me would become increasingly convinced that I was harboring disease. This concern, and their reactions to it, would become increasingly irrational, leading to outright atrocity to keep me from spreading whatever imagined plague they think I carry.
I don’t want to step on toes, but if I understand corrrectly, any member can edit any page. I wanted to offer context here before I do that.
Awesome site. I’m gonna hang out here.
in discussion Per Page Discussions / Per page discussions » SCP-471
This article was fully copied from the main site and is in the process of being re-written.
in discussion Per Page Discussions / Per page discussions » SCP-3136
This article was fully copied from the main site and is in the process of being re-written.
in discussion Per Page Discussions / Per page discussions » SCP-3027
This article was fully copied from the main site and is in the process of being re-written.
in discussion Per Page Discussions / Per page discussions » SCP-3039
This article was fully copied from the main site and is in the process of being re-written.
in discussion Per Page Discussions / Per page discussions » SCP-031
Somebody had to write something, Dr. Clef did, why can't I?
(Edit: went ahead and edited)
You didn't really summarize the original 5129 from the real wiki and you just kinda made a rough article it's supposed to be SCP-5129 and not Scp 5129.
in discussion Per Page Discussions / Per page discussions » SCP-404
I just wanted to slim down the information. No explaining how they forget memories when counting the image, none of that.
Wacky life.
in discussion Per Page Discussions / Per page discussions » SCP-231
^
|
in discussion Per Page Discussions / Per page discussions » SCP-5043
thank you!
in discussion Per Page Discussions / Per page discussions » SCP-5043
Hey there! Welcome to the site. Personally I think you did quite well!
A couple of suggestions could be that the paragraph regarding "dado brain explosion" could be moved into the Description portion of the article, since it is in the original article's description and it is another effect of the SCP. Another thing would be the listing of the items in the container. Please try to avoid copy pasting directly from the article. You could for example state "…containing other various small objects." Finally, SCP Explained articles are much more informal so you don't need to have the "three (3)". Just use either "three" or "3".
in discussion Per Page Discussions / Per page discussions » SCP-666
in discussion Per Page Discussions / Per page discussions » SCP-666
in discussion Per Page Discussions / Per page discussions » SCP-5043
So this was my first try. Feel free to tell me how I did because I'm unsure.
in discussion Per Page Discussions / Per page discussions » SCP-005-J-EX
the inception is UNREAL!!!!!
in discussion Per Page Discussions / Per page discussions » Additional Context VS Descripttion
I think we could change what is the standard of what is to be written in Additional Context. The word "description" in itself doesn't feel right when including information revealed from experiments or addendums, which may not necessarily be that relevant to the SCP in question.
Basically, I think the description should be limited to the abilities of the SCP and what it itself does anomalously and perhaps what is "obviously" stated up front. Additional Context would be the "twist" or anything that is meant to be inferred from the addendums or any other things attached.
This is also because its really difficult to find anything that fits the current criteria for "Additional Context". Perhaps we could create a new "Additional History" or something like that?
