Recent Forum Posts
From categories:
page 1123...next »

SCP-6739 is currently under investigation by the Department of Surrealistics

Correction: The Department of Theoretical Hypothetics are actually the one doing the investigating.

*ahem* by NDHeckfireNDHeckfire, 15 Nov 2022 13:21

Amusing. No reply is necessary.


Add a title. Stay safe; stay well.

I'm posting here because I'm not old enough for an account on the main wiki. For everyone who downvoted this article because you thought it violated the letter or spirit of the Short Works Contest, it doesn't and never has for a simple reason.

Firstly, the wording of the Short Works contest is that all submissions must be mainlist SCPs with less than 500 words and no format screws designed explicitly to subvert these expectations. That's it. Because this article has 0 words and uses a format screw for reasons other than subverting the rules, it most adamantly didn't cheat the letter of the contest. Communism will winCommunism will win made a mockup for the article with 198 words.

Secondly, people don't seem to understand the spirit of the Short Works Contest. I've seen many people saying this use of pictures over words makes the article "unbearable for the contest," which is patently false for one simple reason. 2CY, no better example exists than the motto of the SCP Foundation itself - Secure, Contain, Protect. Security and containment are the methods of the Foundation, but the true goal has always been protecting people - hence, the Archeon class. The same thing applied to the Short Works Contest: the spirit of the competition was never to write in words, as some people would like to claim. That's a method to get people thinking. The spirit of the Short Works Contest, like the entire SCP community from the day Moto42 penned SCP-173, has always been to foster creativity. ●●|●●●●●|●●|● does that perfectly, which is why it won the contest for LurkDLurkD. If I had been a fan back then, I wouldn't have hesitated to defend ●●|●●●●●|●●|● to the last.


Add a title. Stay safe; stay well.

I will t


Add a title. Stay safe; stay well.

Re: Review by IdiosyncraticLawyerIdiosyncraticLawyer, 16 Mar 2022 16:41

Buffallo


Add a title. Stay safe; stay well.

Police by IdiosyncraticLawyerIdiosyncraticLawyer, 16 Mar 2022 15:18

Heya.

I come from the spanish branch, and I have a question. Am I allowed to make laconic articles from the ones from ES (like SCP-ES-056)? Or only the main ones?

Also, another question. Can I translate the laconic articles to spanish in this wiki, or must we create another, like a branch?

SCP-ES by ElInventorElInventor, 06 Feb 2022 21:43

Decided to take a crack at a fairly simple SCP, the gaps in Series I sorta made me sad so I decided I might try to fill at least one. Hopefully this is decent; if so, I can definitely work towards filling out more of these gaps.

There’s a great big nothing in the middle of his head.

i cant belive this scp used to be a library!


original character plz no steel

I'm requesting an edit lock of the main page.
About five minutes ago, a user blanked the entire page and replaced it with a pornographic image I need not go into. I reverted it to the previous revision, but you should restrict editing of the main page due to its vulnerability and importance as the main page of the site, possibly to moderators.
Thanks,
Inferno,
A Guy Nobody Knows who Joined the Site Two Minutes Ago

Emmm are there moderators here?

Who are the mods here? by (account deleted), 15 Jul 2021 01:53

Hi there! I’m the author of SCP-1025 and a few other articles on the main site. I had an attack of nostalgia/need for ego boosting today and decided to Google this one since it seems to be my most popular. I came across this site and I love it.

One thing: SCP-1025 doesn’t inflict diseases or even symptoms on anybody who reads it. In inflicts the targeted paranoia of other people on the person who reads it.

That is to say, if I read any entry in the book, people around me would become increasingly convinced that I was harboring disease. This concern, and their reactions to it, would become increasingly irrational, leading to outright atrocity to keep me from spreading whatever imagined plague they think I carry.

I don’t want to step on toes, but if I understand corrrectly, any member can edit any page. I wanted to offer context here before I do that.

Awesome site. I’m gonna hang out here.

Correction by LasergooseLasergoose, 04 Jul 2021 16:44

This article was fully copied from the main site and is in the process of being re-written.

In Rewrite by JackLivesByARiverJackLivesByARiver, 26 May 2021 12:55

This article was fully copied from the main site and is in the process of being re-written.

In Rewrite by JackLivesByARiverJackLivesByARiver, 26 May 2021 12:54

This article was fully copied from the main site and is in the process of being re-written.

In Rewrite by JackLivesByARiverJackLivesByARiver, 26 May 2021 12:53

This article was fully copied from the main site and is in the process of being re-written.

In Rewrite by JackLivesByARiverJackLivesByARiver, 26 May 2021 12:52

Somebody had to write something, Dr. Clef did, why can't I?

Updated the old SCP. by WhereDidIGoAgainWhereDidIGoAgain, 22 Apr 2021 23:06
Editing SCP-1399's description
(account deleted) 08 Feb 2021 14:41
in discussion Per Page Discussions / Per page discussions » SCP-1399

(Edit: went ahead and edited)

Editing SCP-1399's description by (account deleted), 08 Feb 2021 14:41

You didn't really summarize the original 5129 from the real wiki and you just kinda made a rough article it's supposed to be SCP-5129 and not Scp 5129.

by VaultAceVaultAce, 05 Feb 2021 13:45

I just wanted to slim down the information. No explaining how they forget memories when counting the image, none of that.


Wacky life.

by AnotherBubblebathAnotherBubblebath, 01 Feb 2021 18:22
page 1123...next »
Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License